By Tom Bradley
As regular readers will know, I follow Jeremy Grantham and his colleagues at GMO with great interest. Jeremy’s quarterly missives are always enlightening and the firm, which is based in Boston, has a great long-term track record.
One of the things GMO does every month is publish a return forecast for a number of asset classes. The chart projects 7-year ‘real’ returns (after inflation). I’ve always been reluctant to make forecasts like this because it’s pretty much a crap shoot (GMO provides lots of warnings to that effect), but I think their work is useful as a gut check. In a period of great volatility and depressing news, the projections get us back to what ultimately drives returns from financial assets - long-term profitability and valuations.
Because of their longer-term nature (7 years), the numbers don’t move around much from month to month, but over the course of 2008 they’ve changed a lot. For example, on December 31st, 2007 they projected a return for U.S. large-cap equities of -1.1% (real return per annum for the period ending 2014). Some other equity categories were slightly better, but it was a pretty uninspiring outlook.
Given what’s happened in 2008, the latest forecast (November 30th) is considerably more positive (see attachment). GMO is now looking for U.S. large-caps to return 7.4% real. The other equity categories are even higher – U.S. high quality (11.4%), International large-cap (9.2%) and emerging markets (10.7%).
These estimates are certain to be wrong, but they’re instructive nonetheless. According to GMO, we’ve gone from extremely poor value to exceptional value in a matter of months. The numbers reinforce something we’ve been reminding our clients and readers, which is that we should be adjusting our return expectations...UPWARDS...not down. Double-digit equity returns are quite likely over the next 3 years.
We don’t know if we’ve seen the market bottom, or it’s yet to come (and the GMO numbers don’t help us with that). But everything we look at – valuation, investor sentiment (bearish) and capital flows – tells us that this isn’t the RRSP season to skip. The reward/risk tradeoff hasn’t looked this good since the gloomy campaign of 2003.